All locations

Right-Sizing

Occupancy · Modeled

Seat demand is read from modeled occupancy peaks. Badge entries never record departures, so they cannot show concurrent presence.

Applies to every site scenario below.

Window

Target utilization at peak

80%

Scope

All locations — 1 scenario stacked below

The Woodlands

Occupancy · Modeled1 floors · 47 planned seats

Inputs for The Woodlands. All figures below recompute from these.

Scope

Annual cost / seat

Annual cost / sq ft

Sq ft / seat

P95 daily peak

Occupancy · Modeledof 47 planned seats

95th percentile of working-hour peaks

Median daily peak

Occupancy · Modeled÷ planned 47

Seats justified @ 80%

Occupancy · ModeledP95 29 ÷ 80%

Surplus seats

Occupancy · ModeledPlanned − justified

Annual cost of surplus

$70K

Occupancy · Modeled1,790 sq ft freed

Seat basis $70K · Area basis $59K

Occupancy · Modeled

Sizing to the mid-week peak costs real money. The gap between Tue–Thu and Mon/Fri is the premium you pay for two days a week.

Mid-week P95 is 29 vs 23 on the lightest day — sizing to mid-week costs about $42K per year in seats that sit empty the rest of the week.

Occupancy · Modeled

Working-hour peak per day, last 90 days

Occupancy · Modeled

Lightest floor folded into a floor with spare peak capacity.

Not enough floors at this site to model a consolidation.

Stated so the numbers survive scrutiny.

Demand basis
P95 of daily working-hour peak concurrent occupancy from occupancy counts. Occupancy, not badge.
Why P95, not max
One fire-drill or all-hands day should not drive a lease decision. P95 keeps 19 of 20 days comfortable.
Seats justified
P95 peak ÷ target utilization at peak. At 80%, a P95 of 40 justifies 50 seats.
Cost figures
Editable per-site inputs above each scenario. Seat basis and area basis are shown separately — they are different accounting views of the same surplus.